Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against the Attorney General of the State of New York

The Donald Trump Jr. Defamation Suggestions for Using Overvalued Explicit Financial Statements to Prevent Bankruptcy

The Statement of Financial Condition was never worked on by Trump Jr., he said. As far as I’m aware, people may have asked about things that I gave them an answer to that they could use as a basis of knowledge to come up with a better solution, but it’s not related to the financial statement.

Indeed, on Thursday, Ms. James filed a letter with the New York judge, saying that Mr. Trump’s Florida lawsuit demonstrated that the former president was “attempting to shield the key documents governing the structure of his business conglomerate and ownership of his business assets from review.”

Donald Trump is scheduled to answer questions under oath on Wednesday in a defamation lawsuit.

An assistant state attorney asked Trump questions ranging from whether he was currently the president of the Trump Organization, to whether he had an agreement with his then-chief financial officer to prepare years of financial statements that were intentionally overvalued. He was asked if he personally approved the valuation methods used to value properties. To each question Trump replied, “same answer.”

Last month James sued Trump, Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump and the Trump Organization for allegedly using inflated financial statements to secure favorable terms on loans, insurance, and tax benefits in a decades-long fraud scheme. She is seeking to restrict their ability to conduct business in New York and recover $250 million in ill-gotten gains. The Trumps have denied any wrongdoing and have called the lawsuit politically motivated.

After taking a year off to get a bachelor’s degree, Trump Jr. began working at the Trump Organization in 2001 and has been there ever since. He started in a low-level position on construction sites, expanded to negotiate numerous high-profile building projects, and in 2017 was named one of the three trustees overseeing the company when his father became president. He said he now works in Florida.

The case against Donald Trump Jr. regarding a reference on 40 Wall Street, a Trump leased building with the New York attorney general’s office

He said that his knowledge of US accounting rules, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, is limited to a college course he took.

I am not an accountant but I know that GAAP is accepted, he said when asked. I remember from Accounting 101 that the only way to kill time is to invent new things, but I would be doing ourselves a disservice by not educating ourselves.

The accounting firm Mazars was dropped by the Trump Organization earlier this year as its engagement letter warned of potential future liability. In the engagement letter, Mazars said the client, Trump, was responsible for the accuracy of the information in the financial statements.

It seems like an odd thing, especially after 30 years of doing tax returns, to do it, Trump Jr. testified. “The semantics of the language in the letter, I can’t tell if that was always the language from the engagement letters from 2011 and on, or did it become sort of a, let’s call it, you know, cover-your-ass language later on after 30 years of doing a tax return.”

“Those people would have more intimate understanding of the specifics of those things. If the document was more accounting, then it was probably from accounting. If it was more legal, it would be from legal. And, ‘Hey, are we okay signing this document? Do you believe it to be honest and accurate?’ And if they were okay with it, they’d have much more knowledge than I would ever be able to amass, so I would sign it,” he testified.

When asked about a specific reference on a spreadsheet relating to 40 Wall Street, a Trump leased building around the corner from the New York attorney general’s office where the deposition took place, Trump Jr. switched into dealmaker mode.

“I did all the leasing of the lovely building over your right shoulder. The lovely real estate that sits right there is something that I would be foolish to not point out. I get to stare all day, he said.

Trump Jr. said that they are not that down. I can still see about 30,000 square foot of a floor plate, and have you thought about moving office buildings?

Last week, a federal judge cleared the way for Trump’s testimony saying the former President had already taken steps to delay the case and he “should not be able to run out the clock.”

Trump denied the allegations while at the White House, but the Justice Department and Trump said he was a federal employee. The government can’t be sued for defamation so it would be better for the Justice Department to be the defendants.

Kaplan ruled against Trump and the DOJ. They appealed. Last month a federal appeals court in New York ruled that Trump was a federal employee when he denied Carroll’s claim of rape and sexual assault.

The Washington DC appeals court was asked to determine if Trump was acting within the scope of his employment by making the allegedly defamatory statements. If the DC court finds in favor of Trump, then the Justice Department would likely be substituted as a defendant and the case dismissed. The DC appeals court has yet to take up the matter, though it’s possible they will soon.

The Mueller Investigation of a Tax Case against President Donald W. Bragg: Mr. Weisselberg’s Special Benefits Account to a Democratic Lobby

When deciding on a potential liability, the jury can apply an adverse inference against someone if they refuse to answer questions.

A civil lawsuit was brought by protestors against Trump who said they were hurt outside of his first presidential campaign. He is also expected to testify in another civil lawsuit relating to a marketing campaign by the end of the month.

Mr. Bragg’s tax case grew out of a broader investigation into the former president and whether he fraudulently inflated the value of his properties to obtain favorable deals from lenders and insurers. The district attorney sought an experienced witness to testify against the former president, and chose Mr. Weisselberg, a man who had worked for Mr. Trump and his family for decades. When he resisted their pressure campaign, the office indicted Mr. Weisselberg and the two corporations for the special perks.

Susan Necheles, a lawyer for the company, said Weisselberg’s acts were done to benefit himself and not to benefit the company. The defense is expected to argue that the company lost money because of the arrangement, even though prosecutors could argue it saved the company money.

The lawyers could argue that Mr. Weisselberg was coerced into giving testimony, noting that he could have faced many years in prison. He will spend less than a year in jail because of good behavior, but he will serve five months with a plea deal.

A judge could impose up to fifteen years in prison on him if he lied on the witness stand, according to his lawyer.

Mr. Trump, who was not accused of participating in the benefits scheme, has chalked up the case to a “witch hunt” against him, echoing the refrain he uses to leverage legal woes into a rallying cry for his political base.

A federal judge in September dismissed Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, several ex-FBI officials and more than two dozen other people and entities that he claims conspired to undermine his 2016 campaign by trying to vilify him with fabricated information tying him to Russia.

“This, certainly on its face, appears to be objectively frivolous,” said Gerald Greenberg, a partner at Gelber, Schachter and Greenberg, a Florida law firm. There is no authority that allows a state court in Florida to stop an investigation being conducted by New York state authorities.

The people with knowledge of the situation said that Mr. Garten had blamed Mr.Epshteyn for the filing of the suit. Frustrations with Mr. Epshteyn among some of Mr. Trump’s other aides and representatives have been brewing for months and boiled over with the new legal action.

“I personally know Trump was not on trial. But actually, what’s funny, I don’t think most people in this world know that Trump’s not on trial,” the juror said. “But like everyone realizes that on the jury because it was ingrained in our head 20 times.”

They felt generally that Trump and his family probably knew about the fraud schemes but still tried to stay away from the topic because it wasn’t relevant to the charges, the juror said.

The juror had a feeling about their vote going into deliberations and agreed with the jury that they needed to understand the law for a few jurors who were unsure of some counts. The jury was instructed to re-hear the jury charge for five of the 20 counts before reaching a verdict.

“We knew there was a crime committed and it seemed like they were passing blame. That appears to be the Donald Trump style. the juror told CNN. “And it’d be nice if I could just be a billionaire, whatever he is, and just like, hire people to do stuff for me and commit crime and shield me and get away with it.”

The juror said that it confirmed that they stopped doing it when they said in the cleanup of 2017: it seemed weird. It was clear that the company was doing things that they weren’t good at, so it was a culture of fraud in the company. So how could someone working in a company that has fraud going on from different angles be operating solely for themselves.”

There was no doubt that a crime had been committed. They were all blaming each other on the defense.

He mimicked aderogatory mannerisms towards Donald Bender during the closing statements. I thought it was disrespectful and not necessary, the juror said.

The trial was going on for six weeks. We went through a number of different things. There was a lot of crime there and things that are illegal going on there.

“If I listened to just the defense and didn’t listen to the prosecution, yeah, I probably would have believed them. But when you go through everything, put everything together, the big picture, looking at the witnesses, like game their credibility, the actual physical evidence I saw, you know, that helps me get to the conclusion.”

“Sophisticated defense counsel should have known better,” the judge wrote, adding, “In its discretion this Court will not impose sanctions, which the Court believes are unnecessary, having made its point.”

The judge also rejected the Trumps’ arguments that some of the alleged fraudulent conduct occurred beyond the statute of limitations allowed under the law.

But while it is not clear that Mr. Trump will ever be charged with a crime or found liable in the civil cases, that approach appears less effective for him than it has ever been in fending off investigations and potential legal peril.

In the Georgia investigation, Mr. Trump has called Fani T. Willis, the district attorney leading the inquiry, as well as other Black prosecutors investigating him, “racist.”

The investigation into the payment of hush money to Daniels, who was associated with the 2016 presidential campaign, is being handled by the New York District Attorney.

When Donald Trump allegedly sued: The law against the theft of public information at Trump’s resort is not about liberty and justice, or does it violate the constitutional right?

Times reporters cover politics. We rely on our journalists to be independent observers. Times staff are not allowed to support or campaign for candidates. Contribute to a political candidate or raise money for an election cause if you participate in marches or rallies in support of a movement.

Trump sued the journalist, Bob Woodward, for allegedly releasing audio from their interviews without his consent.

“You can wear down a private party if they do not have the same resources as you, or you can settle a civil case and make it go away, but criminal cases are not about money,” said Chuck Rosenberg, a former U.S. attorney and F.B.I. official. “Criminal cases are about liberty and justice, and it is really rather difficult — if not impossible — to wear down federal prosecutors and the F.B.I. and make them go away.”

It’s been nearly eight years since he rode down the escalator in Trump Tower and more than two years since the January 6, 2021, insurrection, but the legal drama surrounding Donald Trump has never been more intense.

The $130,000 payment was paid by former Trump attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to Daniels to remain quiet about an alleged affair between Daniels and Trump years earlier.

Prosecutors have also looked into potential insurance fraud after new material came to light from the New York attorney general’s civil investigation into the accuracy of the Trump Organization’s financial statements, people close to the investigation told CNN’s Kara Scannell in January.

Jack Smith is the special counsel in charge of the Justice Department’s criminal investigations into the retention of national defense information at Trump’s resort.

The documents from the Trump White House may have been mishandled when they were taken to Florida, according to the Justice Department. A federal grand jury has interviewed potential witnesses regarding how Trump handled the documents.

The National Archives, charged with collecting and sorting presidential material, has previously said that at least 15 boxes of White House records were recovered from Mar-a-Lago, including some classified records.

Legal experts told CNN that any unauthorized retention of White House documents could violate the criminal law against the removal or destruction of official government records.

The Mueller investigation of Donald Trump and his alleged illegal campaigning in California: The grand jury revealed that the Capitol attack was committed on January 6

Aspects of the Justice Department’s probe include the use of so-called fake electors from states that Trump falsely claimed he had won, such as Georgia and Arizona.

Trump has been fighting to keep former advisers from testifying about certain conversations, citing executive and attorney-client privileges to keep information confidential or slow down criminal investigators.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis oversaw a grand jury investigation into the actions of Trump and his allies in their attempt to overturn the victory of Biden.

The grand jury issued a report – which remains mostly under seal – that found there was no widespread voter fraud in the state and also suggested perjury charges be considered against some people who testified.

Dramatic evidence of Trump’s actions before and on January 6 was discovered by the House select committee investigating the US Capitol attack.

In a symbolic move, the committee referred Trump to the Justice Department on at least four criminal charges before it concluded at the end of 2022, ahead of Republicans taking control of the House.

Former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg pleaded guilty to his role in the tax scheme and was sentenced to five months at Rikers Island. He will be released this summer.

Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and has called the investigation politically motivated based on the electoral ambitions of James, a Democrat.

The trial over Carroll’s initial lawsuit has been delayed because of the ongoing legal battle while the second trial is set to begin in April.

Source: https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/20/politics/donald-trump-legal-clouds/index.html

The Trump-Russia Investigation & Trump’s Taxes: A First-Principle, Second-Liouville Trial, and a Second Law

The various cases accuse Trump of directing assault and battery; aiding and abetting assault and battery; and violating Washington laws that prohibit incitement of riots and disorderly conduct.

Trump and his top advisers have not been charged with any crimes. The former president and others have argued they are not responsible for the people’s actions at the Capitol.

Strzok and Page were the subject of a lot of verbal attacks from the President and his allies during the Trump-Russia investigation. After Strzok was fired, Trump persistently called for his immediate removal.

US District Judge Donald Middlebrooks wrote in his opinion that the lawsuit lacks substance and legal support.

Middlebrooks ruled that the former president and his attorneys were responsible for $1 million in sanctions due to bringing the case in the first place.

“No reasonable lawyer would have filed it,” Middlebrooks wrote. The counts of the amended complaint were only intended for a political purpose.

Michael Cohen sued Donald Trump, the Attorney General William Barr and others, saying they put him back in jail so he wouldn’t promote his upcoming book while he was under home confinement.

Cohen started a campaign against President Trump on social media during the summer of 2020 because he was being held for lying to Congress and campaign violations. Cohen spent 16 days in solitary after he was sent back to prison.

The judge threw out the lawsuit. Lewis Liman said that he was sympathetic to Cohen’s position but that Supreme Court precedent precluded him from letting the case move forward.

“The Times’s coverage of Donald Trump’s taxes helped inform the public through meticulous reporting on a subject of overriding public interest,” the Times said in a statement. “This lawsuit is an attempt to silence independent news organizations and we plan to vigorously defend against it.”