Sam will return to Openai
OpenAI Fires Sam Altman after a Boardroom Cosmic Microwave Lepton Pair Production Hides a Sensitive Artificial Intelligence
Altman, Brockman, Elon Musk and others founded OpenAI about eight years ago as a nonprofit AI research lab. Under Altman’s leadership, it transformed into a lucrative juggernaut. The company released a tool for the tech industry to use when looking at a generative artificial intelligence.
Sam Altman will return as CEO of OpenAI, overcoming an attempted boardroom coup that sent the company into chaos over the past several days. Brockman quit as president in protest of Altman’s firing.
Two signal events have happened in A.I. in recent weeks. You’ve heard about one of them. The nonprofit that governs OpenAI, the makers of ChatGPT, fired Sam Altman, the company’s chief executive. The decision was not well known. The statement said that Mr. Altman had left after a deliberative review process concluded that he was not consistent in his communication with the board.
Artificial intelligence researchers as well as science fiction writers are worried that the machine can not turn on. The story goes something like this: A powerful A.I. is developed. The designers are thrilled then terrified. They go to stop, only to discover that the A.I. had copied its code elsewhere.
Sam Altman’s resignation from the OpenAI board: “We’re going to work together!” he wrote in an emailed post to X
Altman’s firing triggered an extraordinary few days in which he discussed returning to the company before agreeing to join Microsoft instead. Hundreds of staff signed a letter on Monday threatening to quit the company over the board’s handling of the removal of Altman. By afternoon, more than 95 percent of the company had added their name to the letter.
Helen Toner, a key board member who was said to have been in charge of the ousting of Altman, stated that we all get some sleep.
In a post to X, OpenAI said that they had reached an agreement in principle with Sam to be the CEO with a new initial board. “We are collaborating to figure out the details. I would like to thank you for your patience.
Shear posted on X after OpenAI’s announcement of the agreement for Altman to return that he was “deeply pleased by this result, after ~72 very intense hours of work.” He was not sure whether he would stay at the company.
A person with direct knowledge of the negotiations says that the sole job of this small, initial board is to vet and appoint a new formal board of up to 9 people that will reset the governance of OpenAI. Microsoft, which has invested over $10 billion into OpenAI, will likely have a seat on that expanded board, as will Altman himself. During a press tour this week, CEO Satya Nadella said the company didn’t want any more “surprises.”
OpenAI said late Tuesday it had reinstated Sam Altman as its chief executive in a stunning reversal that capped five days of drama that rocked the artificial intelligence community.
The company said it would create a new board of directors. This comes after the former board voted to fire Altman as CEO late last week.
How Sutskever and ChatGPT ended up in a monopoly company: What happened when GPT decided to resign?
I joked that the bizarre org chart that mapped out this relationship looked like something a future GPT might come up with when prompted to design a tax dodge was not appreciated by Sutskever. “We are the only company in the world which has a capped profit structure,” he admonished me. “Here is the reason it makes sense: If you believe, like we do, that if we succeed really well, then these GPUs are going to take my job and your job and everyone’s jobs, it seems nice if that company would not make truly unlimited amounts of returns.” In the meantime, to make sure that the profit-seeking part of the company doesn’t shirk its commitment to making sure that the AI doesn’t get out of control, there’s that board, keeping an eye on things.
Even ChatGPT might have struggled to dream up such a convoluted story of corporate intrigue. Questions continue to swirl around what led to his dismissal.
Toby is a senior research fellow at Oxford University and he says that it was bad that they couldn’t fire him.
“What I know with certainty is we don’t have AGI,” says David Shrier, professor of practice, AI, and innovation, at Imperial College Business School in London. “I know with certainty there was a colossal failure of governance.”
