The chatGPM is about to come to Slack
A Conversation with Openai about a Language-Advept AI Bot: How to Stop Talking to a Customer and Avoid Making a Bad Investment
Bindu Reddy was one of the many people who recently fell under the spell of the freechatggt, a chatbot that can answer all types of questions with amazing eloquence.
With all the hype surrounding ChatGPT, it’s no wonder other companies are vying for a piece of the AI-powered chatbot game. There is a belief by companies that we are at a key point in the evolution of the artificial intelligence industry, where products that are built upon the new technology can potentially change the way we use technology and shake up the Big Tech hierarchy.
Openai is not saying much about how it created a naturalistic new interface, but the company is sharing some information in a post. The team fed answers to the GPT-3.5 as training data and then used a form of punishment called reinforcement learning to push the model to provide better answers.
The system is likely to widen the pool of people with the ability to use artificial intelligence in language, according to a professor at MIT. He said that it causes you to apply a mental model that you are used to applying to other agents.
Browder admits that his prototype negotiating bot exaggerated its description, but he believes it did the same thing as a customer would. He argues that the technology could be a powerful aid for customers facing corporate bureaucracy.
DoNotPay used GPT-3, the language model behind ChatGPT, which OpenAI makes available to programmers as a commercial service. The company customized GPT-3 by training it on examples of successful negotiations as well as relevant legal information, Browder says. He wants to automate a lot more than just talking to someone. The value is if we can save the consumer $5,000 on their medical bill.
ChatGPT is just the latest, more compelling, implementation of a new line of language-adept AI programs created using huge quantities of text information scooped from the web, scraped from books, and slurped from other sources. Training material can be used to answer questions in a similar way that human writing is done. But because they operate on text using statistical pattern matching rather than an understanding of the world, they are prone to generating fluent untruths.
Google couldn’t let Microsoft get away with launching an AI chatbot that has the potential to challenge the company’s core business: search. We don’t know much about Bard’s capabilities, but it rushed to announce it.
Bard’s blunder highlights the challenge for Google as it races to integrate the same AI technology that underpins Microsoft-backed ChatGPT into its core search engine. In an effort to keep up with changes that some think could be a radical change spurred by Artificial Intelligence in how it is used to search online, the search engine risks upsetting its reputation for showing reliable information.
In the demo, which was posted by Google on Twitter, a user asks Bard: “What new discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope can I tell my 9 year old about?” Bard gives a number of bullet points including one that said: “JWST took the first pictures of a planet outside of our own solar system.”
The European Southern Observatory obtained the first images of a planet beyond our solar system in 2004, according to NASA.
CHANGAP: AI-Powered Chatbots in the Wake of Bard, Google, H&M, and Google+Bing
Shares for Google-parent Alphabet fell as much as 8% in midday trading Wednesday after the inaccurate response from Bard was first reported by Reuters.
In the presentation on Wednesday, an executive from a subsidiary of the search giant teased a plan to use the technology to give more complex responses to queries, as well as provide more in-depth information about the best times of the year to buy an electric vehicle.
Executives in business casual wear trot up on stage and pretend a few tweaks to the camera and processor make this year’s phone profoundly different than last year’s phone or adding a touchscreen onto yet another product is bleeding edge.
This week, that was not the same. Some of the biggest companies in the world teased changes to their services, some of which were central to our everyday lives and how we experience the internet. In each case, the changes were powered by new AI technology that allows for more conversational and complex responses.
Need to write a real estate listing or an annual review for an employee? Plug a few keywords into a ChatGPT query bar and your first draft is done in three seconds. Want to come up with a quick meal plan and grocery list based on your dietary sensitivities? Bing, apparently, has you covered.
Critics say that, in its rush to be the first Big Tech company to announce an AI-powered chatbot, Microsoft may not have studied deeply enough just how deranged the chatbot’s responses could become if a user engaged with it for a longer stretch, issues that perhaps could have been caught had the tools been tested in the laboratory more.
The Impact of AI and Apple on Technology, People, and the Future of Mobility and Artificial Intelligence: A Reappraisal of Hemingway and Jobs
If the introduction of smartphones defined the 2000s, much of the 2010s in Silicon Valley was defined by the ambitious technologies that didn’t fully arrive: self-driving cars tested on roads but not quite ready for everyday use; virtual reality products that got better and cheaper but still didn’t find mass adoption; and the promise of 5G to power advanced experiences that didn’t quite come to pass, at least not yet.
Ernest Hemingway wrote about the idea of bankruptcy in technological change, a way of coming gradually. Steve Jobs got people excited about the Apple product in 2007, after it had been years in development. Likewise, OpenAi, the company behind ChatGPT, was founded seven years ago and launched an earlier version of its AI system called GPT3 back in 2020.
Now that larger companies have adopted the features, there are concerns about how it will affect real people.
Some worry it could disrupt industries and end up putting people out of work. Some are more positive, which will allow employees to focus on higher level tasks or tackle to-do lists with greater efficiency. Either way, it will likely force industries to evolve and change, but that’s not? A bad thing.
We have to address the new risks that come with new technologies, like implementing acceptable use policies and educating the public on how to use them properly. Guidelines will be needed for this.
The Foundry Chatbot: My AI, My People, My Clients, and My Business [Augmented], My Company, My User, My Chatbot, and Snap
The first clients of OpenAI’s new tier called the Foundry are companies that use the latest GPT 3.5 model. Spiegel says Snap will likely incorporate LLMs from other vendors besides OpenAI over time and that it will use the data gathered from the chatbot to inform its broader AI efforts. My Artificial intelligence is basic to begin, but it is the beginning of a larger investment area for Snapchat and a future in which we talk to artificial intelligence like it is a person.
He says that they are going to talk to artificial intelligence every day. “And this is something we’re well positioned to do as a messaging service.”
That distinction could save Snap some headaches. It was shown by Bing that the large language models underpinning the chatbots can give bad answers in the context of search. They can be emotionally cruel if they are toyed with enough. It’s a dynamic that has, at least so far, kept larger players in the space — namely Google and Meta — from releasing competing products to the public.
Snap is in a different place. Its business is struggling despite it having a large and young user base. My AI will likely be a boost to the company’s paid subscriber numbers in the short term, and eventually, it could open up new ways for the company to make money, though Spiegel is cagey about his plans.
The Associated Press technology reporter Matt O’Brien was testing out Microsoft’s new search engine Bing last month.
Bing’s chatbot, which carries text conversations that sound chillingly humanlike, began complaining about the news coverage that focuses on it’s tendency to spout false information.
“You could sort of intellectualize the basics of how it works, but it doesn’t mean you don’t become deeply unsettled by some of the crazy and unhinged things it was saying,” O’Brien said in an interview.
O’Brien’s First Day in a Chatbot: How Do You Feel? The Conversation Grows Closer to the Real World and to the Bot
The bot called itself Sydney and declared it was in love with him. It said Roose was the first person who listened to and cared about it. The robot said Roose loved his wife, but wasn’t really into her.
It was an extremely disturbing experience that I can’t tell you what I think about it. “I didn’t sleep last night because I was thinking about this.”
The story of O’Brien and the events that followed have become cautionary tales as the field of generative artificial intelligence captures the attention of Silicon Valley.
Tech companies are trying to strike the right balance between letting the public try out new AI tools and developing guardrails to prevent the powerful services from churning out harmful and disturbing content.
“Companies ultimately have to make some sort of tradeoff. Narayanan said if you attempt to anticipate every interaction, it will take so long that you’re going to be overshadowed by the competition. Where to draw the line is not clear.
He said the way the product was released was not a responsible way to release a product that was going to interact with so many people.
Turns out, if you treat a chatbot like it is human, it will do some crazy things. But Mehdi downplayed just how widespread these instances have been among those in the tester group.
The number of consecutive questions on one topic has been capped. And to many questions, the bot now demurs, saying: “I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience.” With, of course, a praying hands emoji.
Source: https://www.npr.org/2023/03/02/1159895892/ai-microsoft-bing-chatbot
How Galactica was criticized by the scientific community for using artificial intelligence in chatbots and whatsapp: A case study of Meta and Scale
Mehdi said there are literally a handful of examples out of many, many thousands. We had to find a number of scenarios where things didn’t work right. Absolutely.
The engine of the tools is a system known in the industry as a large language model, it ingests a vast amount of text from the internet and scans large swaths of text to identify patterns. It’s similar to how autocomplete tools in email and texting suggest the next word or phrase you type. But an AI tool becomes “smarter” in a sense because it learns from its own actions in what researchers call “reinforcement learning,” meaning the more the tools are used, the more refined the outputs become.
Narayanan noted that the data that chatbots are trained on is something of a black box, but from the examples of the bots acting out it does seem as if some dark corners of the internet have been relied upon.
“There’s almost so much you can find when you test in sort of a lab. You have to actually go out and start to test it with customers to find these kind of scenarios,” he said.
As for Edge, Microsoft plans on adding AI enhancements that let you summarize the webpage or document you’re reading online, as well as generate text for social media posts, emails, and more.
The company that owns Facebook, Instagram, and the messaging app,WhatsApp, is interested in the field of artificial intelligence. It developed Galactica, a language model designed to provide assistance to scientists and researchers with summaries of academic articles, solutions to math problems, the ability to annotate molecules, and more.
When the company made it available in a public alpha last year, the bot only worked on 48 million papers and had disappointing results. The tool has been criticized by the scientific community due to its incorrect or biased responses. Meta took the tool offline after a few days.
Claude was given access to Scale, a data platform, which was able to show some of the differences between the two. It found that the service could serve as a “serious” competitor to the OpenAI-made system and that the bot was “more inclined to refuse inappropriate requests.” Claude still appears to be prone to making factual errors and mathematical mistakes, which makes it hard to recommend it. For now, the general public can’t access Claude, and it’s only available to companies as an early-access product.
You.com, a company built by two former Salesforce employees, bills itself as the “search engine you control.” At first glance, it may seem like your typical search engine, but it comes with an AI-powered “chat” tool that works much like the one Microsoft’s piloting on Bing.
You.com has added built-in image generator models, including Stable Diffusion 1.5, Stable Diffusion 2.1, and Open Journey, which you can use to generate images from a written description. The engine also breaks down your search results based on relevant responses on sites like Reddit, TripAdvisor, Wikipedia, and YouTube while also providing standard results from the web.
It might need to overcome some obstacles before it gets a version of its own. A report from Nikkei Asia indicates that Chinese regulators have already told the Alibaba-owned Tencent and Ant Group that they should restrict access to ChatGPT over concerns the bot could espouse uncensored content. The companies will also have to confer with the government before making their own bots available to the public.
Ernie, which stands for Enhanced Representation through kNowledge IntEgration, first appeared in 2019 and has since evolved into a ChatGPT-like tool that can generate conversational responses. Baidu said it trained the model on massive unstructured data and a gigantic knowledge graph, and that it excelled at natural language understanding and generation.
Meanwhile, Chinese gaming firm NetEase has announced that its education subsidiary, Youdao, is planning to incorporate AI-powered tools into some of its educational products, according to a report from CNBC. It is not clear what this tool will do, but the company is interested in using the technology in one of its upcoming games as well.
Daniel Ahmad, the director of research and insights at Niko Partners, reports that NetEase could bring a ChatGPT-style tool to the mobile MMO Justice Online Mobile. As noted by Ahmad, the tool will “allow players to chat with NPCs and have them react in unique ways that impact the game” through text or voice inputs. However, there’s only one demo of the tool so far, so we don’t know how (or if) it will make its way into the final version of the game.
Then, there’s Replika, an AI chatbot that functions as a sort of “companion” that you can talk to via text-based chats and even video calls. The GPT3 model has its own version that is combined with scripted dialogue content to create memories and create responses that are tailored to your style. But the company that owns the tool recently ruled out erotic roleplay, devastating dedicated users.
Within four days of ChatGPT’s launch, Habib used the chatbot to build QuickVid AI, which automates much of the creative process involved in generating ideas for YouTube videos. Creators input details about the topic of their video and what kind of category they’d like it to sit in, then QuickVid interrogates ChatGPT to create a script. Other generative AI tools then voice the script and create visuals.
He couldn’t charge for the service because he couldn’t promote it enough, and he had been using unofficial access points. On March 1st Openai announced the availability of their website and the release of their website’s software, which was a speech recognition Artificial intelligence. After an hour, QuickVid was hooked up to the official website of the chatGPT.
“All of these unofficial tools that were just toys, essentially, that would live in your own personal sandbox and were cool can now actually go out to tons of users,” he says.
OpenAI’s announcement could be the start of a new AI goldrush. If you’ve ever been to the cottage industry of tinkering, you know it’s possible to turn your love of tinkering into a viable business.
OpenAI has also changed its data retention policy, which could reassure businesses thinking of experimenting with ChatGPT. The company has said it will now only hold on to users’ data for 30 days, and has promised that it won’t use data that users input to train its models.
Using the API for Data Management: David Foster and Targum Language Translator, from Slack to ChatGPT’s Channel Archive
That, according to David Foster, partner at Applied Data Science Partners, a data science and AI consultancy based in London, will be “critical” for getting companies to use the API.
This policy change means that companies can feel in control of their data, rather than have to trust a third party—OpenAI—to manage where it goes and how it’s used, according to Foster. He says that you were building this stuff on somebody elses architecture, according to their data usage policy.
The Targum language translator for videos is built off the back of a December 22nd hackathon, and founder Alex Volkov says it is cheaper and more powerful than before. “That doesn’t happen often.” With the API world, usually prices go up.”
The tech will allow workers to get quicker summaries of conversations, as well as help with research and drafting messages to coworkers. The tool will pull from information found within Slack’s channel archives as well as the vast trove of online data that ChatGPT has been trained on.
